Volumes & Issues: Does Academic Writing Really Need Them?

The ISSN (International Standard Serial Number), a unique identifier for serial publications, often dictates formatting requirements. Many scholars question whether specific journal elements, such as volume and issue numbers, are universally necessary. These queries frequently lead to discussions about can academic writings have volumes and no issue number, especially in digitally published formats. The practices advocated by the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA) provide guidelines, but adherence can vary. The rise of open-access journals utilizing digital object identifiers (DOIs) complicates traditional volume and issue considerations, prompting deeper analysis of citation conventions and academic rigor.

Image taken from the YouTube channel Malke Asaad, M.D. , from the video titled Volume, Issue Number and Pages in #eras2024 .

Academic journals stand as the cornerstone of scholarly communication. They are the primary venue for researchers to disseminate findings, engage in critical discourse, and contribute to the ever-evolving body of knowledge within their respective fields.

But in an era defined by digital publishing and rapid information dissemination, it's time we re-evaluate some longstanding conventions.

The Significance of Academic Journals

These publications, often peer-reviewed, rigorously assess the quality and validity of submitted research before granting it entry into the scholarly record. This process ensures a level of credibility and reliability, differentiating journal articles from other forms of information available.

From groundbreaking discoveries to nuanced theoretical arguments, academic journals chronicle the progress of human understanding. They are essential resources for students, researchers, and professionals alike.

The Conventional Roles of Volumes and Issues

Traditionally, academic journals have relied on a system of volumes and issues to organize and categorize published articles.

Volumes typically represent a year's worth of publication. While issues demarcate specific installments within that year. Think of volumes as annual collections, and issues as the individual chapters released periodically.

This structure provides a chronological framework, enabling readers to locate specific articles and track the development of research over time. It offers a means of quickly identifying when an article was published and its place within the journal's overall output.

Are Volumes and Issues Always Necessary?

However, the digital revolution has ushered in new models of academic publishing. These models challenge the necessity of adhering to the traditional volume and issue format.

The core question we must ask is this:

Is it always necessary to have both volumes and issues in academic journal publications, particularly in the context of modern digital publishing?

With the advent of continuous publication, where articles are released online as soon as they are ready, the relevance of issue numbers becomes less clear. Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) provide a unique and persistent link to each article, regardless of its placement within a specific issue.

This raises the possibility that, in some cases, volumes alone may suffice, streamlining the publication process and reducing unnecessary complexity. The exploration of this question is vital to ensure that academic publishing adapts to the evolving needs of researchers and readers in the digital age.

Academic journals have traditionally relied on volumes and issues, but what purpose do they actually serve in organizing scholarly work?

Understanding the Roles of Volumes and Issues

The volume and issue system, a long-standing convention in academic publishing, provides a framework for organizing and categorizing research articles.

Understanding the purpose and function of these identifiers is crucial for navigating the scholarly landscape, even as digital publishing models evolve.

The Purpose of Volume Numbers

Volume numbers primarily serve as chronological markers, typically indicating the year or years of publication.

A volume encompasses all the issues published within a specific timeframe, most often a calendar year.

For example, Volume 25 would signify all the issues released by a journal during its 25th year of publication.

This provides a clear indication of when the research was conducted and disseminated, allowing readers to trace the evolution of knowledge within a field.

Furthermore, volume numbers can sometimes represent a specific period or theme, particularly in journals dedicated to historical research or special collections.

The Purpose of Issue Numbers

Within each volume, issue numbers denote specific installments released periodically.

These installments often correspond to a particular month, quarter, or other predefined period.

For instance, a journal published quarterly might release Issue 1 in March, Issue 2 in June, Issue 3 in September, and Issue 4 in December, all within the same volume.

Issue numbers help to further refine the chronological organization, enabling readers to pinpoint the exact publication date of an article within a given volume.

In some cases, special issues might be dedicated to a specific theme or conference proceedings.

Categorization and Organization Within Issues and Volumes

Academic articles are carefully curated within issues and volumes to maintain thematic coherence and logical flow.

Editors often group articles based on related topics, research methodologies, or theoretical frameworks.

This arrangement facilitates knowledge discovery, allowing readers to easily identify articles of interest within a specific issue or volume.

The table of contents typically provides an overview of the articles included in each issue, along with author names, titles, and page numbers.

Furthermore, indexes and databases often use volume and issue numbers to categorize and organize articles, enabling efficient searching and retrieval.

While volumes and issues provide a traditional structure for organizing academic work, it's essential to consider the evolving landscape of digital publishing and the potential for alternative approaches.

Understanding the purpose and function of these identifiers is crucial for navigating the scholarly landscape, even as digital publishing models evolve. So, when do traditional organizational structures loosen their grip, and journals choose a different path?

When Volumes Stand Alone: The Case for Publishing Without Issues

The academic publishing landscape is evolving. While the traditional model of organizing research into volumes and issues has served its purpose for centuries, the rise of digital publishing and continuous publication models has opened up new possibilities. One such possibility is the publication of journals with volume numbers but without distinct issue numbers.

Scenarios Where Issues Are Absent

Several scenarios can lead to a journal opting to publish volume numbers without issue numbers. These often correlate with the publication’s frequency and overall publishing philosophy.

Low Publication Frequency

Journals with very low publication frequency, such as those publishing only a few articles per year, may find the concept of issues unnecessary. If a journal releases only three or four articles in a given year, grouping them into separate issues might seem artificial and redundant.

In such cases, the volume number alone adequately serves as a chronological marker.

Focus on Article Independence

Some journals prioritize the individual merit and accessibility of each article over its placement within a specific issue. This approach is often seen in open-access journals that focus on rapid dissemination of research.

By eschewing issues, these journals can publish articles as soon as they are ready, without waiting for a predetermined issue release date. This accelerates the dissemination of knowledge.

The Impact of Publication Frequency

The frequency with which a journal publishes directly impacts the perceived need for issue numbers. High-frequency journals, such as those publishing monthly or even weekly, almost always rely on issue numbers to maintain order and provide a clear organizational structure.

However, for journals with lower publication rates, the benefits of issue numbers become less pronounced.

Consider a journal that publishes one article per month.

While it could theoretically assign each month an issue number, the practical value of doing so is minimal. The volume number already provides sufficient chronological context.

Rolling Publication and Continuous Models

The rise of continuous publication models has further blurred the lines between volumes and issues. In this model, articles are published online as soon as they are accepted and finalized, rather than being batched into issues.

This approach allows for faster dissemination of research and eliminates the delays associated with traditional issue-based publishing.

In a purely continuous publication model, the concept of a distinct issue becomes largely irrelevant.

Articles are assigned to a volume based on their publication year, but there are no formal issues within that volume. Instead, each article stands alone, identified by its DOI and other metadata. This represents a significant shift in how academic research is organized and accessed.

Understanding the purpose and function of these identifiers is crucial for navigating the scholarly landscape, even as digital publishing models evolve. So, when do traditional organizational structures loosen their grip, and journals choose a different path?

DOI and ISSN: Identifying Academic Works in the Absence of Issue Numbers

In the evolving world of academic publishing, the absence of traditional issue numbers might raise questions about how to accurately identify and cite scholarly works. Fortunately, the Digital Object Identifier (DOI) and the International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) provide robust and reliable alternatives, often rendering the volume and issue structure secondary in importance.

The Indispensable Role of DOI and ISSN

DOI and ISSN serve as cornerstones in the identification and citation of academic works, especially in digital environments. These identifiers offer unique and persistent links to specific articles and publications, irrespective of their placement within a conventional volume and issue framework.

DOI: A Persistent Link to Scholarly Content

A DOI is a unique alphanumeric string assigned to a digital object, such as a journal article. It acts as a permanent, resolvable link, ensuring that the resource can be found even if its URL changes. This persistence is critical in academic research, where stable and reliable access to sources is paramount.

The DOI system was created to solve the problem of broken links and the ephemeral nature of web addresses. By assigning a DOI, publishers ensure that an article remains accessible through a persistent identifier, regardless of website migrations or content reorganizations.

ISSN: Identifying the Journal Itself

The ISSN, on the other hand, identifies the journal itself, rather than a specific article. It is an eight-digit code that distinguishes a particular serial publication from others.

ISSN helps libraries, databases, and researchers accurately track and manage journals, ensuring consistency in cataloging and indexing. Both print and electronic versions of a journal will typically have their own ISSN, reflecting their distinct formats.

Unique and Persistent Identification: Beyond Volume and Issue

The strength of DOI and ISSN lies in their ability to provide unique and persistent identification, regardless of the organizational structure of the journal. These identifiers function independently of volume and issue numbers, offering a reliable means of accessing and citing scholarly content.

This is particularly relevant for journals that publish articles on a rolling basis or those that opt for a volume-only publication model. In such cases, the DOI acts as the primary identifier, allowing researchers to pinpoint a specific article without relying on issue details.

Referencing with DOI: A Practical Example

In practice, citing an article using its DOI is straightforward. Most citation styles now recognize and encourage the inclusion of DOIs in bibliographic entries. For instance, instead of providing volume and issue information, a citation might simply include the DOI at the end of the reference.

This approach not only simplifies the citation process but also ensures that the link to the original source remains active and accessible. For example:

Smith, J., & Jones, A. (2023). The impact of digital publishing on academic research. Journal of Scholarly Communication, DOI: 10.1234/jsc.2023.0001

In this example, the DOI provides a direct link to the article, bypassing the need for volume and issue details. This is especially useful when those details are either unavailable or deemed less relevant by the publisher.

The DOI resolves directly to the article, providing immediate access regardless of any changes in the journal's website structure. The DOI provides a stable and reliable link, ensuring that readers can access the cited source even if the journal's website undergoes changes.

Understanding the purpose and function of these identifiers is crucial for navigating the scholarly landscape, even as digital publishing models evolve. So, when do traditional organizational structures loosen their grip, and journals choose a different path?

Citation Styles and Bibliographic Databases: Navigating the Absence of Issue Numbers

The move toward online-only publications and continuous publication models presents a challenge: How do established citation styles and sprawling bibliographic databases adapt when the familiar issue number is missing? Maintaining clarity and consistency in citation practices is paramount, not just for academic rigor but also for the discoverability of research.

Adapting Citation Styles

Different citation styles (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.) have guidelines for handling missing information in citations. The absence of an issue number is not a completely novel scenario, and existing style manuals often provide specific instructions.

Generally, when an issue number is unavailable, the citation focuses on the volume number, year of publication, and page range (if applicable). Some styles might recommend noting the absence of an issue number explicitly, while others implicitly treat the publication as a volume-only entity.

For example, APA style might require you to omit the issue number entirely, simply listing the volume, year, and page range. MLA might suggest using "n.d." (no date) or "n.p." (no page) where applicable, but these are usually for missing dates or page numbers, not issue numbers. The key is to adhere strictly to the chosen style's guidelines to maintain consistency within your work.

Examples of Citation Adaptations

Let's consider a hypothetical article: "The Impact of Digital Archives on Historical Research" published in Volume 15 of the Journal of Digital Humanities in 2023, without an issue number, spanning pages 45-60.

• APA: Journal of Digital Humanities, 15, 45-60.
• MLA: Journal of Digital Humanities, vol. 15, 2023, pp. 45-60.
• Chicago: Journal of Digital Humanities 15 (2023): 45-60.

These examples demonstrate how the core elements of the citation (journal title, volume, year, page range) remain, even without the issue number.

Indexing in Bibliographic Databases

Bibliographic databases such as JSTOR, Scopus, and Web of Science play a critical role in indexing and cataloging academic literature. Their handling of articles without issue numbers is essential for discoverability.

Most databases are designed to accommodate variations in publication formats. When an issue number is absent, the database typically relies on the DOI, ISSN, volume number, and publication year to accurately index the article.

Advanced search algorithms are often used to compensate for missing information, ensuring that the article appears in relevant search results. However, the completeness of the metadata provided by the publisher is crucial for accurate indexing and retrieval.

Ensuring Discoverability

Publishers play a vital role in ensuring that articles are correctly indexed in bibliographic databases. Supplying complete and accurate metadata, including the DOI, ISSN, volume number, publication date, and page range, is essential.

Databases often use automated crawlers to extract information from journal websites. If the information is missing or inconsistent, it can lead to indexing errors and reduced discoverability. Therefore, publishers must prioritize metadata quality and adhere to database-specific guidelines.

The Need for Clarity and Consistency

The evolving landscape of academic publishing demands clarity and consistency in citation practices. Researchers, publishers, and database providers must work together to adapt to new publication models while maintaining the integrity of scholarly communication.

Clear guidelines from citation style manuals, accurate metadata from publishers, and robust indexing practices from bibliographic databases are all essential. The goal is to ensure that all scholarly works, regardless of their publication format, can be easily identified, cited, and discovered. This collaborative effort is crucial for fostering a reliable and accessible research environment.

Citation practices are clearly evolving, adapting to the nuances of digital publishing and the increasing prevalence of online-only journals. But how do these shifts impact the publishers themselves, the gatekeepers and architects of academic dissemination?

The Publisher's Perspective: Adapting to Evolving Academic Publishing Models

Academic publishers stand at the intersection of tradition and innovation.

They are tasked with upholding the rigor of scholarly communication while simultaneously navigating the rapidly changing landscape of digital publishing.

The move toward volume-only publications, and the loosening of strict issue-based formatting, presents both challenges and opportunities for these institutions.

Embracing Volume-Only: A Publisher's Rationale

Why might a publisher choose to forgo the traditional volume and issue structure?

The answers lie in a combination of efficiency, agility, and responsiveness to the evolving needs of the academic community.

Speed of Dissemination: One of the most compelling arguments for volume-only publishing is the ability to accelerate the dissemination of research.

Without the need to compile a complete issue, articles can be published online as soon as they are ready, significantly reducing the time between acceptance and accessibility.

This is particularly crucial in fields where timely access to the latest findings can have a significant impact.

Continuous Publication: Many journals now operate on a continuous publication model, where articles are added to a volume on a rolling basis.

This approach eliminates the constraints of traditional issue-based publishing, allowing for a more fluid and dynamic flow of information.

In this model, issue numbers become largely superfluous.

Resource Optimization: From a practical standpoint, eliminating the need to create and manage distinct issues can streamline the publication process.

This can translate to reduced administrative overhead, allowing publishers to focus their resources on other critical areas, such as peer review and quality control.

Benefits of Flexible Formatting

The potential benefits of not adhering to strictly defined issue and volume-based formatting are numerous.

Agility and adaptability, as mentioned, are paramount.

However, there are also subtler advantages that can enhance the overall publishing experience.

Enhanced Discoverability: By focusing on individual articles and their associated metadata (including DOI, keywords, and abstracts), publishers can improve the discoverability of research.

Search engines and bibliographic databases are increasingly adept at indexing individual articles, regardless of their placement within a specific issue.

Greater Author Satisfaction: The ability to publish articles quickly and efficiently can significantly enhance author satisfaction.

Researchers are often eager to see their work disseminated as soon as possible, and a volume-only publication model can help to meet this expectation.

Experimentation and Innovation: Freed from the constraints of traditional formatting, publishers can experiment with new forms of content and presentation.

This can include interactive graphics, multimedia supplements, and other innovative features that enhance the reader experience.

Accommodating Academic Needs

Ultimately, the decision to adopt a volume-only publication model must be driven by the needs and preferences of the academic community.

Publishers have a responsibility to provide a platform that supports the dissemination of high-quality research in a way that is both efficient and accessible.

Listening to the Community: Publishers are increasingly engaging with researchers to understand their evolving needs and expectations.

This can involve conducting surveys, hosting focus groups, and participating in industry conferences.

Flexible Options: Some publishers offer a range of publication options, allowing authors to choose the format that best suits their needs.

This can include traditional issue-based publications, as well as volume-only options for those who prioritize speed and flexibility.

Embracing Change: The academic publishing landscape is constantly evolving, and publishers must be willing to embrace change in order to remain relevant.

This requires a willingness to experiment with new models, adapt to emerging technologies, and listen to the needs of the academic community.

By prioritizing flexibility, efficiency, and author satisfaction, publishers can play a vital role in shaping the future of scholarly communication.

Video: Volumes & Issues: Does Academic Writing Really Need Them?

Play Video